|
Coalition
Defends Educational TV
From Right-Wing Takeover
Washington -
A broad coalition of national educational and religious organizations
are urging their members to write to Congress to fight a growing
takeover of reserved educational licenses by ultraconservative religious
broadcasters under the guise of religious freedom. Members are urged
to tell their representatives to oppose House Resolution 3525, known
as the "Religious Broadcasting Freedom Act" and Senate
Bill S.2010, known as the "Noncommercial Broadcasting Freedom
Act."
The still growing
coalition includes educational groups like the National Education
Association, Center for Media Education, People for the American
Way, Benton Foundation, Political Research Associates and National
Writers Union and religious groups like the National Council of
Churches, The Interfaith Alliance and Unitarian Universalists.
Coalition coordinator
Jerry Starr, Executive Director of Citizens for Independent Public
Broadcasting, observes, "Already having easily intimidated
the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) into rescinding guidelines
intended to protect educational licenses from partisan abuse, the
religious right and their political allies now seek to deprive the
FCC of all discretion to properly defend any eligibility requirements
for noncommercial educational (NCE) television licenses."
Attorney John
Crigler has notified the FCC that this is part of a growing takeover
of NCE broadcasting licenses by the religious right. In the absence
of any regulation, such groups have flooded the FCC with applications
for NCE licenses, effectively barring community organizations with
a genuine educational purpose. Donald Wildmon's American Family
Association alone holds 165 NCE radio licenses and has 178 pending
full-service applications.
Cutting through
the rhetoric and reminding the FCC of its legislative responsibility,
Diane Shust, Manager of Federal Relations at the National Education
Association, has proposed that meaningful eligibility requirements
for reserved educational licenses "is not discrimination against
religion, but a defense of education. It is not unwarranted federal
intrusion, but the FCC doing its duty to protect the public interest,
convenience, and necessity."
Randy Naylor,
Director of the 53 million-member National Council of Churches (NCC)
agrees, "Protecting the integrity of a noncommercial and public
channel does not constitute discrimination against religious broadcasters."
In the view of the NCC, these channels "should provide a diversity
of truly educational programs for all significant constituencies
in the community."
Rob Cavenaugh,
Legislative Director, Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations
adds, "The issue here is not government hostility towards religion,
but weighing the needs of the whole community against the wants
of a strident religious minority." Ralph G. Neas, President
of People for the American Way, has accused religious broadcasters
of "asking for special privileges and claiming that failure
to grant them is discrimination."
Starr points
out that, under the guise of "religious freedom," many
of these broadcasters pass off hate mongering as educational. In
the Pittsburgh license transfer case that sparked the new guidelines
and the reaction, local clergy and academics documented for the
FCC Cornerstone TeleVision attacks against Catholics, Jews (e.g.
leaders of an international conspiracy of bankers and intellectuals
to create a "New World Order"), Hindus ("the Kingdom
of the enemy"), Unitarians (promoters of "divorce, teenage
pregnancy and venereal disease"), Mormons ("a cult"),
and even Methodists, Baptists, Episcopalians, Lutherans, and Congregationalists
who are alleged to be "not really Christian" unless they
are "born again."
Members of the
coalition are asked to place action alerts on their web sites and
to link with Citizens for Independent Public Broadcasting so that
members might receive direction on how to write to their representatives
in Congress on this matter. "Beyond that," Starr says,
"we plan to call for a rulemaking to revisit this question
of eligibility requirements for reserved education frequencies and
how the public interest might best be served." He adds, "Perhaps
in a non-election year, we might have a less hysterical climate
in which to reflect on the true meaning of education and religious
freedom as they apply to broadcasting."
Background
The two resolutions
follow an FCC decision on the Pittsburgh license transfer applications
that exposed Senator John McCain's influence peddling on behalf
of media mogul Lowell "Bud" Paxson. The highly controversial
deal proposed to transfer the license for Pittsburgh's popular second
public television station, WQEX, to televangelist station, Cornerstone
TeleVision, so that Paxson could take over Cornerstone's old license
for his Pax TV network.
The Save Pittsburgh
Public Television campaign generated tens of thousands of letters
and phone calls, plus organizational resolutions representing hundreds
of thousands more in opposition to the deal because residents did
not want to lose WQEX and were offended by its proposed replacement
which a group of Pittsburgh academics and clergy charged offered
bible thumping hatemongering as educational programming.
Under pressure
by McCain, the commissioners narrowly approved (3-2 vote) the sale/swap
conditional on Cornerstone's promises to broaden its governance
and programming. However, by the same margin, the commissioners
voted to interpret the guidelines that educational frequencies provide
programming that is "primarily educational" and "responsive
to the overall public" as meaning that at least half the station's
schedule must consist of programs that are "primarily educational
in purpose." Moreover, "programming primarily devoted
to religious exhortation (e.g. preaching), proselytizing or personal
statements of belief [while permitted], generally will not qualify
as educational programming."
Within days,
a torrent of protest from members of the National Religious Broadcasters
(NRB), a self-described "Association of Christian Communicators,"
Paxson Communications, and their conservative Republican allies,
intimidated the FCC into rescinding its own guidelines. Several
reporters also have cited pressure from Presidential candidate Al
Gore who is running as a "born again" Christian against
Bill Bradley and did not want to have to defend the additional guidance
during the campaign.
In her dissent,
commissioner Gloria Tristani deplored her colleagues' capitulation
to "an organized campaign of distortion and demagoguery."
Tristani stated, "In a religiously diverse society, sectarian
religious programming, by its very nature, does not serve the 'entire
community' and is not 'educational' to non-adherents."
A spokesperson
for the NRB boasted about winning the "battle," but vowed
to continue the "war." In mid-February, FCC Mass Media
Bureau Chief Roy Stewart appeared at the NRB's annual meeting to
assure them that the commission is going back to relying "on
the good-faith judgment of religious broadcasters that the programming
serve an educational purpose." Nevertheless, Oxley and Brownback
have vowed to leave their resolutions in Congress to make certain
that the FCC does not regulate religious broadcasters too closely
in the future.
Before the FCC's
sudden retreat, the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, Executive Director, Americans
United for the Separation of Church and State, had commended the
new guidelines as a "fair and reasonable" attempt "to
ensure that educational TV stations are truly educational and not
extensions of somebody's religious ministry." He urged the
FCC "not to cave in to pressure from powerful religious broadcasters
and their political allies." In the aftermath, Lynn has reaffirmed
his organization's commitment to protecting the integrity of educational
broadcasting license assignments.
|